Reply To: “Recommended Posts” (was: “Best of the Forums”) – NEWBIES PLEASE RESPOND

Home › Forums › Forum News and Issues › “Recommended Posts” (was: “Best of the Forums”) – NEWBIES PLEASE RESPOND › Reply To: “Recommended Posts” (was: “Best of the Forums”) – NEWBIES PLEASE RESPOND

#44464
BenS
Participant

This sounds like a good idea in theory. Not sur eif it would work to well in practice or not. Couple of questions:
Where would it be kept?
How would it be organised?
How do we define best? Out of context some of the greatest posts sound quite bad.

If someone who could effectively write a gist (not me I over write and suddenly it is as long as the original just in different words) it would be good.An obvious rule, but it has to be said, no self nominating.

On regularity it is hard to say some weeks are busy some are not. Maybe you should have a flexible benchmark.

To answer my own question to an extent, would this appear on the wiki or the forum. On the wiki it can be neatly organised and have sub headings for gimmicky things as Word Association highlights of the week, or such like. On the forum it could just get lost in a very long thread and be hard to find in between all the comments about it. Though on the wiki forum people could be unaware of its existence. Arguments both ways. It could be good for example to catch up after you get home from an internet free week or some such.