Reply To: Bigger than a Breadbox: Twenty Questions, JoCo-Song-Style
Q1: Does the song refer to the addition, subtraction, or alteration of body parts?
A: Not of body parts, no.
Q2: Would you characterize the song as a slow, sensitive one, or a fast, hard-driving one, or is it some kind of third type that those descriptions wouldn't apply to?
A: It is on the fast, hard-driving side
Q3: Does the song involve geekyness (Computers, Maths, ect)?
A: Nope
Q4: Does it involve in anyway feeling fantastic?
A: Definitely not.
Q5: And would you say it appeared either on one of the smaller, 5-song CDs, or on one of the earlier ones like Smoking Monkey or Other Experiments?
A: I would not say that.
Q6: Does the song include any reference to a sporting or nonsporting contest?
A: The song does not include any reference to a sporting or nonsporting contest.
Q7: This may call for some interpretation on your part, Buggy, but — does the main thrust of the song come from an inherently absurd or unrealistic concept or situation?
A: Depends on your definition of unrealistic. But chances are, like me, you'll say yes.
Q8: Does it center around a relationship that didn't last or that is unlikely to last?
A: We shall assume that the relationship is between two people, or one person and a mythological creature, or maybe two seahorses, or a giant squid and a person, or a planet and its moon, or something along those lines. The song does not center around that subject.
Q9: Stab in the dark: Is there any reference, tacit or explicit, to cannibalism?
A: Nope
Q10: Is it among the last five tracks of Thing a Week IV?
A: Yes, and since that narrows it down considerably, I won't do the shady, pedantic clue dump quite yet. Good one Bry.